With respect to the built environment, however, I have a lot of respect for 'anthroposophic' products. Whilst there have always been individual figures experimenting with the design of alternative geometries: Antoni Gaudi, Imre Makovecz, Bruno Taut etc., architecture based on anthroposophic concepts seem to be the only movement that has argued and produced built environments that avoid the right angle for more than 80 years.

As Herr Remund pointed out it is not strictly correct that Steiner or anthroposophic architects avoid the right angle - it's more a case of balancing the use of it. Thus the Goetheanum does have its fair share of right angles, but the box-like north-eastern part gradually becomes more and more sculptural towards the south-western end. A static part of the building balanced by a dynamic part - a hybrid between a box and freeform sculpture - between the average city office block and Le Corbusiers's Notre Dame du Haut a Ronchamp.